the-repossessed.comwebsite Home is where the heart is!!

Return to Useful Stuff

 

www.one-voice-action-group.com
Telephone: (44) 1202 517317
Email: discoveries@btinternet.com
Fax: 44(0)1202 532722 Ms Sheridan
Greenland,
Office for Judicial Complaints
10th Floor,
The Tower
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
 
2 March 2010
 
OPEN LETTER RE WHITE COLLAR CRIME AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS, CREATING A CULTURE OF OPPRESSION FOR THE BRITISH PEOPLE....

Dear Ms Greenland,

Re: SERIOUS COMPLAINT ABOUT "JUSTICE" IAN BURNETT: aiding and abetting forgery, fraud and money-laundering through HMCS

I was grateful to speak to you today, following my discussion with Amanda Jeffery about some alarming issues of misconduct going on with various judges in the High Court. I am writing to lodge a more detailed formal complaint about the above-named person, which is the first of a number of complaints being brought from affected civilians who have turned to 'One Voice Action Group' for help and assistance in implementing Truth and Justice with regards to their individual cases.
It is clear that the System urgently needs to be reviewed, to tighten up the controls in place to discipline Judges where corruption or Judicial impropriety occur, particularly because of their lauded positions in 'High places'. If they are able to freely enjoy the power and status that goes with being a judge, then they surely need to be held even more accountable than someone in a lowly position ? Yet the present set up seems to provide the opposite, which is having a devastating effect on the conduct of Judges in HMCS and how this is bearing out in the lives of innocent subjects and civilians who are adversely affected by them. Moreover, many of the cases that have been referred to me lately, are becoming more and more alarming in their nature and content, with evidence that certain judges in the High Court are behaving with open corruption, having been rendered 'untouchable' and 'invincible' by a crumbling and thoroughly inadequate Judicial System.
I attended Court last Tuesday 23 February 2010 in order to assist an elderly woman who will soon be 77 years old, called Patricia Miller-Foulds. She has been unlawffully evicted from her home, and it remains a mystery as to who is directly responsible for this illegal act. It is believed to be her solicitors from Hunters in Lincoln's Inn, but it remains unclear at this time since so many parties appear to be involved. My greatest concern is that everything points to this being part of a CARTEL operation of judicial racketeering for profit amidst Judges and major Financial Institutions, with others on the periphery like local police, county courts, certain estate agents etc. I applied for costs on her behalf so that a firm of legal advocates could be instructed forthwith, given that I have no audience in the court, and Judge Burnett chose to distort this request and rounded on me as "acting illegally" for daring to ask for such a thing, despite the pressing emergency involved here. Worse still, he was openly hostile and rancourous in his demeanour, engaging in using highly oppressive tactics that are reminiscent of a bygone Victorian era. He openly disallowed any 'fair hearing' and used threats and bullying techniques in the whole way that he conducted matters. Above all, he refused to address the fact that the Court documents that have been relied upon by several judges before him, are FORGED and FALSIFIED. Instead, he 'closed ranks' to side with the previous judges, and to protect their backs, at the cost of a gross Miscarriage of Justice to Patricia Miller-Foulds. It was sickening to witness, quite frankly. He then refused to allow any access to the Court file, and despite several polite requests from Sheida Oraki for a full copy of the file (which she even offered to pay for), Judge Burnett outrightly denied this access, which the victim is supposed to be entitled to, by Law. He obviously recognises that he has much to hide.
It is our view that Mr Ian Burnett is not fit to sit as a Judge in HMCS, and who should be struck off immediately because he has perjured himself, and has also behaved extremely dishonestly and subjected honest hard-working civilians to uncalled-for cruelty. Above all, he PERJURED himself, in front of a victim of serious crimes perpetrated against her through her own solicitors and others, and in front of 2 witnesses (Elizabeth Watson and Sheida Oraki). The perjury occurred on at least TWO counts, thus: (i) Mr Burnett stated that "Santander / Abbey have repossessed the property" at 63 Eastmead Avenue, Greenford, Middx. UB6 9RF, when there is NO EVIDENCE of this, and a phone call to Lord Burns the CEO of Santander's office yesterday afternoon (when I dealt with James Glendenning) revealed that "there are no records of any eviction proceedings from Abbey/Santander"! This is proof positive that Mr Burnett uttered falsity despite his position - this perjurious statement can only be described as a "serious misuse of power".(ii) Mr Burnett falsely stated "there is a possession Order for the property" - BUT THERE IS NO POSSESSION ORDER THAT IS LEGALLY VALID. And as a senior Judge in the High Court, this man ought to know what is legally valid and what is not ! It can be seen from the 3rd exhibit to the right (below) that there is only a legally invalid SUSPENDED possession order from 19 years ago (1991), which has NO date for possession, and no Judge's name ! It is therefore a FORGED document, and can not be relied upon. (see definition of 'forgery' below). MR IAN BURNETT HAS KNOWINGLY AIDED AND ABETTED FRAUD AND CRIMES AGAINST A 76 YEAR OLD HIGHLY VULNERABLE, SENIOR CITIZEN.
FORGERYThe act of criminally making or altering a written instrument for the purpose of fraud or deceit; for example, signing another person's name to a check. Forgery at common law has been held to be 'the fraudulent making and alteration of a writing to the prejudice of another man's right.' A more modern writer defined it as, 'a false making; a making malo animo, of any written instrument, for the purpose of fraud and deceit.' Please see the exhibits of the Court documents, accompanying this letter.Other key complaints about Mr Burnett are as follows:-1. Violation of ARTICLE 6 of Human Rights; RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL - Mr Burnett deliberately and maliciously deprived Patricia Miller-Foulds or her Mackenzie friends, from a Fair Trial. He would not let any of us give the information that needed to be given, and heard. He did this by disallowing myself to even speak, dismissing me as "not being a Mackenzie friend" because I have a company of 27 years standing ! He also disallowed the victim herself to go into any detail about the glaring unlawful and forged Court documents, and had no chance to explain how her own solicitors had betrayed her and conspired to steal her home, nor the many other violations connected to this sad case. HE REFUSED TO EXAMINE ANY OF THE EVIDENCE PUT BEFORE HIM.2. Violation of ARTICLE 8: RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE & FAMILY LIFE, YOUR HOME AND CORRESPONDENCE: Mr Burnett showed NIL respect for any of these aspects, which Patricia Miller-Foulds has been seriously deprived of, and denied for no lawful reason. He behaved with utmost ignorance and stupidity, with the demeanour of an oppressive 'fat cat' bloated in his own 'comfort zone' and on his artificially elevated platform, engaging in psychological warfare, peering down at the victim of what amounts to a series of very serious CRIMES. He behaved as if he had NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW whatsoever. He knowingly ignored FORGED COURT DOCUMENTS ! the evidence of these (given above, alongside other evidence) was provided to him before the hearing. HE HAS FAILED ABJECTLY IN HIS DUTY AS A 'JUDGE'.3. Violation of ARTICLE 3: "You have the absolute right not to be tortured or subjected to treatment or punishment which is inhuman or degrading." - The victim, Ms Miller-Foulds, broke down and was sobbing in fits of tears, uncontrollable at one point, and Mr Burnett sat there and treated her with utmost CRUELTY, and spoke callously and 'in cold blood'. Ms Miller-Foulds literally begged Mr Burnett to provide an Order for an injunction to stop people from running in and out of her home, stealing her possessions (which they have been doing, their identify is as yet, unknown), but he responded "no, I cannot do that" and gave NO REASON for this appalling disrespect of her belongings and rights. He treated her in a contemptible manner that can only be described as "inhuman and degrading". He deliberately tortured this victim of crime.4. yHe refused to examine the EVIDENCE, and in this way, he deliberately blocked and prevented, Justice. Instead, he only examined the HISTORY of the Case, which is 100% flawed. He ignored the explanations of the discoveries made by myself only over the preceding three weeks, leading to the discovery of serious frauds perpetrated against Ms Miller-Foulds.5. Worse still, Mr Burnett perverted the Course of Justice. by 'covering the backs' of his fellow-Judges who have gone before him (before the frauds were discovered and realised, which is only a very recent thing). He did this by saying "he was following suit" and it was a pre-meditated and contemptible delivery of a message that was RIGGED and BIASED against the Course of Justice. He rehearsed the errors of judgment that are historical and flawed, citing each one of them in a manner so callous that it beggars belief.6. HE USED INTIMIDATION TACTICS AND BULLYING AGAINST MYSELF: Adding insult to injury, and steeped in his pomposity, Mr Burnett then rounded on myself, for no good reason: when I stood up for Justice and Truth and spoke out the Truth, he shouted "sit down - you !" and treated me with ignominy. His ego then got the better of him, and he threatened and harassed me with suggesting I would be "arrested" if I SPOKE ! He called the Court "tip staff" in to try to intimidate me, as the other two watched in amazement and horror. His behaviour could only be described as "CONTEMPTIBLE and DISGRACEFUL".7. HE CONCEALED THE FACT THAT HE MAY BE PROFITING FROM PART OF A CORRUPTION RACKET IN THIS CASE: When challenged by myself and asked (on at least 3 disparate occasions) "are you sitting in a PRIVATE Capacity, your Honour ?" he refused to answer - because it is believed to be TRUE. It is believed 100% that Mr Burnett is engaging in corruption and racketeering within Her Majesty's Court Service, for his own personal profit and monetary gain for 'kick-backs', by covering up fraud and theft of Ms Miller-Fould's home, and disallowing Justice to prevail, using nefarious methods to achieve this end. We are truly outraged by this.8. HE USED CHICANERY AND TRICKERY TO MANIPULATE THE PROCEEDINGS: Mr Burnett did this by speaking of his "Judgment" from the outset, BEFORE ANY HEARING HAD EVEN HAD A CHANCE TO OCCUR ! He kept saying "let me give you my judgment and hear what I have to say", behaving oppressively and putting us down when it was wholly inappropriate to behave in this manner. His "judgement" was FLAWED, was WRONG IN LAW, his conduct and decision was UNLAWFUL, his behaviour was contemptible.9. HE DENIED ANY RIGHT TO APPEAL, DESPITE STRONG GROUNDS FOR DOING SO - his pre-meditated decision was designed to squash Justice and honesty, in favour of a 'rigged outcome' which he had pre-prepared before we entered the Court room. At one point he ran out of the Court room in a fit of temper and tantrum, only to return and give his asinine "judgement' which was 100% biased and full of corrupt statements which were designed to keep the injustices on the Case, intact.Anyone studying the 4 documents that HMCS appear to be relying on in continuing to deprive Ms Miller-Foulds of her home, will quickly see, in all good conscience, that they are ALL illegal and INVALID. Brief details as follows;_1. a document purporting to be a 'Warrant for possession of Land - dated 11 Dec 2009 and signed by the criminal bailiff who illegally evicted Mr Miller-Foulds (Mr J. Annison). It was signed "D.I. Wert" under "for the claimant" and shows NOTHING filled in on the LHS as to the details YET has the court seal showing the application was made at 10am on 2 Nov 2009 ! It shows a fee of £95 with 'Hamlins LLP solicitors, phone no: 0207 355 6000" showing the Claimant as "Abbey National PLC" but NO address for Abbey ! It has NO Possession Order to accompany it (form 66), as required by law. On the LHS it reads "it was ordered that the defendant should give the claimant possession of the said land by 04/2/1991 and it is out of date and there is no Judge's name on it! YES - THAT'S 19 YEARS AGO !Notably, Hamlins solicitors (who purport to be acting for Abbey) had told me (on tape) 3 weeks ago that they had "no record of acting for anyone on 63 Eastmead Avenue, Greenford, UB6", then later changed their story & hung up on me.
2. A SUSPENDED order for possession (chopped off on the corner of the photocopy) shows the Plantiff as "Abbey National" (not even saying PLC) and the Defendant as "Patricia Main Miller' (not even her correct name) AND HAS NO NAMED JUDGE !! It reads "Plaintiff's ref: 20007621" and the same Case number, and reads:-"On hearing - SOLICITORS FOR BOTH PARTIES (who ?)And on reading - THE AFFIDAVIT OF LYNNE ELAINE DENMAN (who is she ?)It is ordered that the defendant do deliver to the plaintiff by the 3rd day of December 1991, possession of the property comprised in a mortgage (or legal charge) dated 3/9/86 and known as: 63 Eastmead Avenue, Greenford, Middx. - but with NO date for the alleged possession!
"And it is further ordered that this order shall not be enforced without the leave of the court whilst the defendant do pay to the plaintiff(s):(a) the arrears of £7803.97 now due under the mortgage (or legal charge) (and the costs)"(WHICH SECTION HAD BEEN CROSSED OUT ABOVE)"by instalments of £175 for every calendar month, the first instalment to be paid + current mortgage by 26/11/91, and(b) all sums to become payable by way of (capital and) interest or otherwise under the mortgage (or legal charge) when such sums shall become due or would have become due had there been no defaultAnd also that this order shall cease to be enforceable when the arrears (and costs) and sums referred to above are satisfied.Dated 5/11/91 !"
It shows "address for payment: A.P. Squires, PO Box 563, Milton Keynes, HK9 1BN" - who are they ?
3. A bogus "Notice of eviction" - dated 11 November 2009 (We note that the Court copy has NO court seal !) WITH NO CLAIMANT MENTIONED ON IT, and a BLANK BOX IN THE LOWER LHS ! It says "Patricia Miller Foulds AND ALL OTHER OCCUPIERS" and says "the eviction will take place on 11 December 2009 at 8am - but it did not. It includes a fake telephone number for Hamlins solicitors, and the bailiff Mr J. Annison is an unreachable number. It is on the WRONG FORM, is NOT a Possession order, and has no Named Judge, and no signature and no court seal.
AND THERE IS A FOURTH 'COURT' DOCUMENT !.....
4. A false 'Notice of Tenure (possession)' issued by TWO employees from HUNTERS SOLICITORS, showing Hunters as the 'Claimants solicitors' - who were acting for Ms Miller-Foulds at the time they issued this, in September 2009 ! These traitorous felons betrayed their own client - by pen and paper. It shows it was received by the Court on 25 Sept 2009 and bears the Brentford county court seal, despite being legally invalid and referring to gibberish about "tenancy, stamp duty, etc" under "Evidence" heading. Above all, it is merely a notice of a HEARING, due at 10.30am on 11 December - yet she was evicted an hour BEFORE she could even get to the court hearing ! This case appears to have uncovered a serious issue of JUDICIAL CORRUPTION which is being laid bare before us. It is unthinkable that the High Court could engage such dishonest and inhuman people to pose as "judges" on cases as serious as this one. How on earth can the Court staff IGNORE THE WRITTEN EVIDENCE and focus on victimising this old lady ?It is nothing short of appalling. We require substantial compensation for the victim and ask that Mr Burnett is removed from his role as a Judge, forthwith. How can any self-respecting citizen be expected to respect the High Court or HMCS, when these kinds of atrocities are occuring ? Please answer me that. Please confirm receipt soonest, thank you.Here is the highly flawed "order" Judge Burnett produced:

 

 
 

Return to Useful Stuff

Terms and Conditions / Privacy Policy

© the-repossessed.com